BreachLabby RateX AI
RateX ecosystem Let’s talk security
Offensive security. Human expertise. AI scale.

Find the breach.
Before they do.

Your next attacker could be AI.
Put your applications and smart contracts to the test with AI-assisted, expert-led security assessments.

Request an assessment
Defined scope. Verified findings. Actionable fixes.
BreachLab / assessment explorerIllustrative demo
Scoped environment
AI + expertise
HighAccess controlBL-DEMO-01

Can one account access another’s data?

Test object-level authorization across roles, then verify the impact with an isolated reproduction.

Evidence before conclusions01 / 04
Explore the path. Understand the impact.
AI-assisted. Expert-validated.
Built for teams
building what’s next.
Authorized testing
Reproducible evidence
Application to protocol
Remediation & retesting

Two disciplines. One security picture.

Every layer is
part of your exposure.

From the API behind your product to the contracts behind your protocol. Choose a focused assessment or connect both into one engagement.

01 / Application security

Penetration testing

See your application through an attacker’s eyes. Uncover weaknesses in access, APIs, and business logic before they become an incident.

  • Web applications & APIs
  • Authentication & access control
  • Business logic & attack chains
BreachLab PentestScope your pentest
02 / Protocol security

Smart contract audits

Pressure-test the code that moves value. Examine contract logic, privileges, and protocol assumptions before a launch or upgrade.

  • Contract logic & permissions
  • Protocol mechanics & integrations
  • Economic assumptions & invariants
BreachLab Protocol AuditDiscuss your protocol

Building a Web3 product? Connect dApp, API, and contract reviews in a single agreed scope.

Explore a combined assessment

Intelligence with a purpose

AI explores.
Experts make
the call.

AI helps structure research and explore hypotheses. Expert review connects findings to your architecture, validates the evidence, and turns it into a practical remediation plan.

Building the BreachLab knowledge engine

Incident research, contextual retrieval, and agent-assisted workflows. Our proprietary scanner is in development.

In development
From hypothesis to evidenceOur methodology

Context first

Your architecture, assets, and trust boundaries define what matters.

Understand

Relevant attack scenarios

Use incident research and AI assistance to guide targeted investigation.

Investigate

Evidence that holds up

Validate impact with controlled reproductions and expert review.

Validate

A clear path to resolution

Prioritized fixes, developer guidance, and agreed retesting.

Resolve
RateX BreachLabIllustrative sample
Security assessment

Clarity your team
can act on.

Example applicationBL-DEMO-01
HighAccess control

Cross-account record access

An authenticated account can retrieve another account’s example record when the server does not enforce ownership.

Expected 403 Forbidden
Observed 200 OK · example record
Remediation guidance included
Scope → Evidence → Impact → Fix → Retest01 / 03

Evidence you can work with

A finding is only useful
if you can fix it.

Give engineering a reproducible issue and leadership a clear view of the risk. Every engagement is scoped around the decisions your team needs to make.

  • Know what was tested

    Documented scope, assumptions, and limitations.

  • Understand the actual impact

    Evidence, severity rationale, and business context.

  • Move from finding to fix

    Actionable recommendations and retest status.

A clear engagement, start to finish

Your scope. Our focus.

Start with a conversation about what you’re building, what’s changing, and what you need to protect.

  1. 01

    Define the scope

    Agree assets, access, testing boundaries, and delivery expectations.

  2. 02

    Test & investigate

    Explore the agreed attack surface with tools, AI assistance, and expert analysis.

  3. 03

    Validate & prioritize

    Confirm findings and explain the evidence, impact, and recommended fixes.

  4. 04

    Fix & recheck

    Work through remediation and verify agreed fixes against the original findings.

Let’s put your security to the test

What are
you building?

Tell us about your application or protocol. We’ll use your brief to prepare the scope discussion.

Scope before testing Pricing by engagement Retest coverage agreed upfront

A scanner is coming.
Today, start with a scoped security assessment.

Request an assessment

No scan starts here
What would you like to assess?
20–4,000 characters. Please don’t include credentials or private keys.

Testing starts only after scope and authorization are agreed.

Before we begin

A few good questions.

Is this an automated scanner?

BreachLab offers scoped, expert-led assessments with AI assistance. Our proprietary scanner and knowledge engine are in development. The interactive examples on this page are demonstrations, not live scans.

Can you assess our entire Web3 application?

We can discuss a combined engagement covering your dApp, APIs, and smart contracts. Supported languages, chains, dependencies, and testing boundaries are confirmed during scoping.

What do we receive?

The proposed engagement includes a report with tested scope, validated findings, severity rationale, reproduction details, and remediation guidance. Retest coverage and deliverables are agreed before testing.

How does pricing work?

Pricing is based on the agreed scope: application size, contract complexity, access requirements, and review depth. Share your brief to start the scope discussion.

Does an audit guarantee security?

An assessment is a review of an agreed scope at a particular point in time. The report documents coverage and limitations. Changes to code, dependencies, or configuration can introduce new risks.

RateX BreachLab
Illustrative sample · fictional system

Security assessment

A preview of the evidence and remediation detail an assessment can provide. This is not a client report or a security certification.

ScopeExample API / account records
FindingBL-DEMO-01 · High
StatusIllustrative · not a live finding

Cross-account record access

The fictional API authenticates a request but does not check whether the requested record belongs to the authenticated account.

Business impact

Another customer’s records could be disclosed across the tenant boundary. Actual severity depends on the data and access conditions.

Evidence

Environment: isolated example application
Actor: account A (standard user)
Resource owner: account B
Expected: authorization denied
Observed: example record returned
No real customer data used.

Recommended remediation

Enforce ownership and tenant authorization on the server for every object access. Use deny-by-default policy and add regression coverage for cross-account requests.

Retest criteria

Account A is denied access to account B’s records across applicable read and write operations. Authorized same-account access continues to work.

Coverage & limitations

A real report identifies the reviewed assets, code revision where applicable, dates, test conditions, exclusions, and unresolved assumptions.
RateX BreachLab

Your assessment request

This form collects your name, email, organization, service preference, timeline, and project brief so RateX Network Foundation US can discuss your security assessment.

Submissions are stored in BreachLab’s private application storage. They are not published on the website. Please do not submit credentials, private keys, confidential source code, or sensitive production data through this form.

Requests are automatically deleted from application storage after 90 days. Operational backups, if configured by the hosting team, have a separate retention policy. RateX may retain separately agreed engagement records when you become a customer.

To ask about your submission or request deletion, use the contact channels listed on ratex.ai and quote your request reference. Sending this form does not authorize a security test.